[Clinical intestinal transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh: an update]

S Todo1, H Furukawa, N Murase

  • 1T.E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi
|November 1, 1996
PubMed

Insights

Intestinal transplantation is feasible, with survival rates improving over time. Pediatric patients show better isolated graft survival than adults, though colon inclusion and CMV-positive donors impact adult outcomes negatively.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Immunology

Context:

  • Intestinal transplantation is a complex procedure for end-stage intestinal failure.
  • This study analyzes outcomes from a significant cohort of intestinal transplant recipients between 1990 and 1996.
  • It examines various graft types, patient demographics, and immunosuppression protocols.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate patient and graft survival rates following intestinal transplantation.
  • To compare outcomes across different types of intestinal grafts (isolated, combined, multivisceral).
  • To identify factors influencing survival, including patient age, graft composition, and donor serology.

Summary:

  • 87 patients underwent 92 intestinal transplantations (isolated, combined liver-intestinal, multivisceral).
  • One-, three-, and five-year patient survival was 73%, 44%, and 44%, respectively; graft survival was 64%, 36%, and 36%.
  • Pediatric patients had better isolated graft survival; colon inclusion and CMV-positive donors negatively affected adult survival.

Impact:

  • Intestinal transplantation is a viable option, but requires optimization of immunosuppression and graft dysmotility management.
  • Findings highlight the need for tailored approaches based on patient age and specific graft characteristics.
  • This research contributes to understanding long-term outcomes and challenges in intestinal transplantation.

Related Concept Videos