Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is it time to abandon brain death?

R D Truog

    The Hastings Center Report
    |January 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The concept of brain death is theoretically flawed and practically confusing, primarily serving organ donation. Rethinking death criteria could improve organ supply and understanding.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A continuum for using placebo interventions in regional anesthesia and analgesia studies.

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2008
    Same author

    End-of-life decision-making in the United States.

    European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement·2008
    Same author

    Spinal muscular atrophy--type I.

    Archives of disease in childhood·2003
    Same author

    Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

    Critical care medicine·2002
    Same author

    Discontinuing immunosuppression in a child with a renal transplant: are there limits to withdrawing life support?

    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2001
    Same author

    The diagnosis of brain death.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same journal

    Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical ethics
    • Neurology
    • Organ transplantation

    Background:

    • The established concept of brain death, while widely accepted, faces significant theoretical and practical challenges.
    • Current definitions and diagnostic criteria for brain death are often inconsistent and lead to confusion.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the conceptual coherence and practical application of brain death criteria.
    • To explore alternative frameworks for determining death that could enhance organ procurement and clarify the definition of death.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of the definition and criteria for brain death.
    • Review of ethical and practical implications of brain death determination.
    • Exploration of alternative criteria for organ procurement.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaHealth Care and Public HealthLegal Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The concept of brain death is identified as theoretically incoherent and practically confusing.
    • The primary utility of the brain death concept is linked to facilitating organ procurement for transplantation.
    • Abandoning brain death criteria may offer a path to increased organ supply and improved understanding of death.

    Conclusions:

    • The current construct of brain death is problematic and requires re-evaluation.
    • Alternative criteria for determining death are needed to improve both organ donation rates and the conceptual clarity of death.
    • Reforming the definition of death could have significant positive impacts on transplantation medicine and philosophical understanding.