Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The analogical mind

K J Holyoak1, P Thagard

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1563, USA. holyoak@psych.ucla.edu

The American Psychologist
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human thinking relies on analogy, guided by similarity, structure, and purpose constraints. This multiconstraint theory explains analogical reasoning in experiments and real-world scenarios like science and politics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning.

NeuroImage·2001
Same author

The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Analogical priming via semantic relations.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

The role of working memory in analogical mapping.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Reasoning and learning by analogy.

The American psychologist·1997
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Analogy is a fundamental aspect of human cognition.
  • Previous models of analogical reasoning have not fully captured its complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and elaborate on a multiconstraint theory of analogical reasoning.
  • To demonstrate the applicability of this theory across diverse domains.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical framework development (multiconstraint theory).
  • Analysis of laboratory experiments on analogy.
  • Examination of analogical reasoning in naturalistic settings (politics, psychotherapy, scientific research).
  • Computational simulations of analogical cognition.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The multiconstraint theory effectively models analogical reasoning.
  • Identified three core constraints: similarity, structure, and purpose.
  • Demonstrated the theory's validity in both controlled experiments and real-world applications.
  • Successfully implemented the theory in computational simulations.

Conclusions:

  • The multiconstraint theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding human analogical thinking.
  • Analogy plays a crucial role in various human endeavors, from scientific discovery to political strategy.
  • Computational modeling offers a powerful tool for exploring cognitive processes like analogical reasoning.