Related Experiment Videos

A 5-year (1990-1994) neuroblastoma screening feasibility study in France. Methodology and preliminary observations

P Mathieu1, D Frappaz, F Chauvin

  • 1Service de Biologie Générale et de Neurobiologie, Centre hospitalier du Vinatier, Bron-Lyon, France.

Early Human Development
|September 20, 1996
PubMed

Insights

This French pilot study screened infants for neuroblastoma using biochemical markers. While 12 cases were detected, further follow-up is needed to assess the screening program's impact on mortality rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Biochemical Screening
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Pilot studies for infant neuroblastoma screening were implemented in Europe and North America, inspired by Japanese efforts.
  • A 5-year feasibility study (1990-1994) for neuroblastoma screening at 4 months of age was conducted in France's Rhône district.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of a large-scale infant screening program for neuroblastoma.
  • To evaluate the detection rates and challenges associated with biochemical screening for neuroblastoma in infants.

Main Methods:

  • Infant urine samples were analyzed for vanillylmandelic (VMA) and homovanillic (HVA) acids.
  • High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for VMA and HVA measurement, with creatinine (Cr) measured by kinetic method.
  • Assay validation included daily intra-laboratory controls and participation in a national quality control program.

Main Results:

  • An overall participation rate of 82.2% was achieved, with 105,293 infants tested.
  • Twelve neuroblastoma (NB) cases were identified through screening, and one additional case was diagnosed later.
  • The study identified 35 false-positive results and noted 3 false-negative cases; 6 cases were diagnosed clinically before screening.

Conclusions:

  • The screening program demonstrated a high participation rate and identified neuroblastoma cases at an early stage.
  • Challenges included missed tests, false positives, and false negatives, requiring careful interpretation of biochemical results.
  • It is premature to draw definitive clinical conclusions regarding the impact on mortality rates; ongoing follow-up is necessary.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos