Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery

J J Regan1, R D Guyer

  • 1Texas Back Institute, Plano 75093, USA.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation may improve fusion rates in cervical arthrodesis in high-risk populations.

Bone & joint research·2018
Same author

Survival and clinical outcome of SB Charite III disc replacement for back pain.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2007
Same author

The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2003
Same author

Mediating denials of pharmaceutical services: an alternative to traditional appeals.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2002
Same author

The relation between cervical discographic pain responses and radiographic images.

The Clinical journal of pain·2000
Same author

Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.

Spine·1999
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebellar Activation With Eyes Closed Is Associated With Delayed Peroneal Reaction Time in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Minimally invasive spinal surgery offers potential benefits like faster recovery and cost savings. However, ensuring safety, efficacy, and proper training is crucial for successful adoption of these advanced endoscopic techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Spine Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly adopted across surgical subspecialties.
  • Technological advancements enhance visualization for spinal procedures.
  • Goals include reduced recovery, morbidity, and costs compared to open surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic spinal surgery.
  • To compare outcomes of minimally invasive approaches with traditional open surgery.
  • To discuss the importance of specialized training and collaboration in endoscopic spine surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of technological advancements in endoscopic spinal surgery.
  • Discussion of the applicability and limitations of minimally invasive spinal techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on training requirements including cadaver practice and preceptorship.

    • Main Results:

    • Improved visualization and potential for reduced trauma with endoscopic techniques.
    • Preliminary results for endoscopic spinal surgery are encouraging.
    • Further comparative studies are needed to validate efficacy and patient satisfaction.

    Conclusions:

    • Endoscopic spinal surgery shows promise but requires rigorous evaluation against open procedures.
    • Specialized training and collaboration are essential for patient safety and optimal outcomes.
    • Demonstrating value in patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness is key for widespread adoption.