Biomechanical evaluation of the canine and porcine models for experimental craniofacial surgery

This investigation compared the variation of the biomechanical properties of canine and porcine craniofacial bones in homotypical (same site in opposite sides of an animal) and heterotypical (same site in different animals) sites. Biomechanical analysis is a reliable method to assess bone healing, because fracture repair correlates closely with the changes in biomechanical properties. Paired bone fragments were harvested in nine dogs and nine minipigs from each side of the skull from three different sites-the frontal bone, the supraorbital rim, and the zygomatic arch- and submitted to torque to failure. Maximum torque, stiffness, and toughness were recorded and comparative analysis performed. A normal range of variation between paired craniofacial bones in two useful animal models is provided. The results showed that the variability between homotypic left and right sides was not significant, whereas the variability between heterotypic sites in separate animals was. Maximum torque was the most reliable of the three parameters considered, because the data fell over a much narrower range. We conclude that the use of the contralateral side is a valid control in experimental procedures that may alter the biomechanical properties of one side.