Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal distinctiveness and modality

A R Marks1, R G Crowder

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA. amarks@helix.nih.gov

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BACE1 inhibition by microdose lithium formulation NP03 rescues memory loss and early stage amyloid neuropathology.

Translational psychiatry·2017
Same author

Expression and regulation of ryanodine receptor/calcium release channels.

Trends in cardiovascular medicine·2011
Same author

A computational model of Purkinje fibre single cell electrophysiology: implications for the long QT syndrome.

The Journal of physiology·2010
Same author

Diastolic transient inward current in long QT syndrome type 3 is caused by Ca2+ overload and inhibited by ranolazine.

Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology·2009
Same author

Exogenous shocks to the human sex ratio: the case of September 11, 2001 in New York City.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2006
Same author

Antioxidant intake is associated with semen quality in healthy men.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2005
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Auditory memory is more sensitive to timing when distractions are also auditory. This suggests silent auditory distraction can hinder memory recall by reducing temporal distinctiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory and Visual Memory
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • The hypothesis that auditory stimuli are more temporally discriminable in memory than visual stimuli remains debated.
  • Previous studies using the continual-distractor paradigm yielded conflicting results, potentially due to variations in distractor task modality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of distractor task modality on temporal discrimination in auditory and visual memory.
  • To reconcile conflicting findings in the literature regarding auditory vs. visual temporal discriminability.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of both word presentation modality (auditory/visual) and distractor task modality (auditory/visual).
  • Utilized the continual-distractor paradigm to assess memory for word lists under different conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Aurally presented word lists showed increased sensitivity to presentation timing when the distractor task was auditory, compared to a visual distractor.
  • This interaction effect was less consistent for visually presented word lists.
  • An interaction between stimulus and distractor modality was observed.

Conclusions:

  • The modality of the distractor task significantly impacts temporal discriminability in auditory memory.
  • Silent auditory distraction may impair memory retrieval by reducing reliance on temporal-distinctiveness information.
  • Findings help explain previous discrepancies and highlight the role of modality interactions in memory performance.