Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Osteopathic physicians and expert medical testimony

G N McAbee1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford 08084, USA.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

The Daubert Standard changed rules for expert medical testimony in court, impacting osteopathic physicians in malpractice cases. This review examines historical and current standards for medical evidence admissibility.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Headache characteristics in patients after migrainous stroke.

Neurology·2002
Same author

Hot water-induced migraine syndrome: further evidence of a relationship between migraine and epilepsy.

European neurology·2001
Same author

A child with Coxsackie A3 encephalitis.

Pediatric neurology·2001
Same author

Commentary: consensual adolescent sexual activity with adult partners--conflict between confidentiality and physician reporting requirements under child abuse laws.

Pediatrics·2001
Same author

A practical approach to uncomplicated seizures in children.

American family physician·2000
Same author

Prolonged survival with hydranencephaly: report of two patients and literature review.

Pediatric neurology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Legal Medicine
  • Medical Testimony Standards
  • Scientific Evidence Admissibility

Background:

  • The admissibility of expert medical testimony has evolved significantly over time.
  • The US Supreme Court's 1993 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ruling introduced new standards.
  • Previous standards for expert witnesses were in place for over 70 years.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical evolution of standards for medical testimony admissibility.
  • To analyze the current Daubert Standard for expert witnesses.
  • To discuss the implications of these standards for osteopathic physicians in medical malpractice litigation.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of legal precedents regarding expert testimony.
  • Analysis of the Daubert Standard and its criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the practical impact on osteopathic physicians.

    • Main Results:

    • The Daubert Standard represents a significant shift from previous admissibility guidelines.
    • These changes affect how medical and scientific evidence is presented in legal proceedings.
    • Osteopathic physicians face new considerations in malpractice cases due to these standards.

    Conclusions:

    • The Daubert Standard has reshaped the landscape for expert medical testimony.
    • Understanding these standards is crucial for osteopathic physicians navigating medical malpractice.
    • Adherence to Daubert guidelines is essential for the successful presentation of medical evidence in court.