Related Experiment Videos
Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur?
1Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Toronto, Ontario. eetchells@torhosp.toronto.on.ca
JAMA
|February 19, 1997
Summary
The clinical examination by cardiologists is accurate for detecting abnormal systolic murmurs. Further research is needed to assess accuracy in non-cardiologist examiners.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Clinical Examination
Background:
- Abnormal systolic murmurs are common clinical findings.
- Accurate diagnosis relies on precise clinical examination.
- Evidence on the diagnostic precision of clinical examination needs review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on the precision and accuracy of clinical examination for abnormal systolic murmurs.
- To identify key clinical findings for diagnosing specific cardiac conditions.
- To assess the reliability of the clinical examination in cardiology.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a MEDLINE search and reviewed reference lists.
- Contacted authors for additional published studies.
- Independent review and quality grading by two observers for each study.
Main Results:
- Reliability of detecting systolic murmurs was fair (kappa, 0.30-0.48).
- Specific findings aid in ruling in aortic stenosis (e.g., slow carotid pulse rise, murmur intensity, S2 intensity).
- Absence of murmur radiation to the right carotid artery is useful for ruling out aortic stenosis.
Conclusions:
- Clinical examination by cardiologists is accurate for detecting various causes of abnormal systolic murmurs.
- Smaller studies suggest accuracy for mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and mitral valve prolapse.
- Studies evaluating non-cardiologist examiners are necessary to broaden applicability.