Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Compromised consent: deficiencies in the consent process for genetic testing

¹Chicago-Kent College of Law, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Women'S Association (1972)

|January 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Implementation of a pharmacist-driven pain management consultation service for hospitalised adults with a history of substance abuse.

International journal of clinical practice·2013

Same author

A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models.

Washington University law quarterly. Washington University (Saint Louis, Mo.). School of Law·2005

Same author

Human cloning: assessing the ethical and legal questions.

The Chronicle of higher education·2003

Same author

Whose genes are they anyway?

The Chronicle of higher education·2003

Same author

Is there a right to clone? Constitutional challenges to bans on human cloning.

Harvard journal of law & technology·2003

Same author

Reproductive technology comes of age.

Whittier law review·2002

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Physicians must improve informed consent for genetic testing by fully disclosing risks and limitations. This ensures patients make noncoerced decisions about genetic screening and understand living with genetic disorders.

Area of Science:

Medical Genetics
Bioethics
Patient Autonomy

Background:

Genetic testing availability is rapidly increasing for various disorders.
Physicians are ethically and legally obligated to obtain informed consent before genetic testing.
Studies indicate frequent deficiencies in physician-provided information regarding genetic testing and its implications.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the current state of informed consent in genetic testing.
To identify shortcomings in physician communication about genetic testing.
To propose improvements for the informed consent process in genetic testing.

Main Methods:

Literature review of studies on informed consent in genetic testing.
Analysis of ethical guidelines and legal requirements for medical procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Examination of physician knowledge gaps regarding genetics and genetic disorders.

Main Results:

Physicians often fail to provide adequate information about the nature and risks of genetic tests.
Instances of genetic testing performed without explicit patient consent have been reported.
Physicians may lack sufficient understanding of genetics and the lived experience of genetic disorders.

Conclusions:

Physicians need to acknowledge and address their knowledge limitations in genetics.
Enhancing the informed consent process is crucial for ethical genetic testing.
Improved communication and patient education are essential for respecting patient autonomy in genetic decision-making.