Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Heart rehabilitation. Cost-effectiveness analysis]

J M Maroto Montero1, C de Pable Zarzosa, M D Morales Durán

  • 1Unidad de Rehabilitación Cardíaca, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.

Revista Espanola De Cardiologia
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Informed consent in cardiac rehabilitation].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1999
Same author

[Cardiac rehabilitation in Spain. Preventive cardiology units].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1999
Same author

[Secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation in Spain. Section of Preventive Cardiology].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1996
Same author

[Cardiac rehabilitation. Its historical evolution and current situation].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1995
Same author

[The control of risk factors in cardiac rehabilitation programs].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1995
Same author

[Cardiac rehabilitation. Other protocols].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·1995
Same journal

[Early remote monitoring of pacemaker devices and benefits of this paradigm shift. The FAST REMOTE study].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with post SARS-CoV-2 sequelae: need to create a multicenter working group. Response].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Myocarditis related SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination: an expert consensus statement on its diagnosis and management].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with post SARS-CoV-2 sequelae: need to create a multicenter working group].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2023
Same journal

[Environment and cardiovascular health: causes, consequences and opportunities in prevention and treatment].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2022
Same journal

[Third-degree atrioventricular block associated with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine].

Revista espanola de cardiologia·2022
See all related articles

Cardiac rehabilitation programs significantly reduce healthcare costs for myocardial infarction survivors. These programs offer substantial savings in direct and indirect expenses, improving patient outcomes and economic efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Cardiac rehabilitation programs enhance quality of life and prognosis for coronary patients.
  • Demonstrating economic efficiency is crucial for widespread implementation of these programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the economic efficiency of a cardiac rehabilitation program.
  • To compare the costs and savings associated with a rehabilitation program versus standard care for myocardial infarction survivors.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 180 myocardial infarction survivors.
  • Two groups were formed: a rehabilitation group (RG) and a control group (CG).
  • Expenses were analyzed at one and six years post-myocardial infarction, including direct (hospital readmissions) and indirect (return to work) costs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The rehabilitation group showed significant cost savings compared to the control group.
  • Direct expense savings (hospital readmissions) were 14,827,539 ptas. for RG vs. 19,901,578 ptas. for CG in the first year, and 36,918,339 ptas. for RG vs. 54,370,249 ptas. for CG by year six.
  • Indirect expense savings (return to work) were 28,750,000 ptas. for RG vs. 54,750,000 ptas. for CG after one year, and 228,250,000 ptas. for RG vs. 438,000,000 ptas. for CG by year six.
  • Overall saving per patient was 272,437 ptas. at one year and 2,415,220 ptas. at six years.

Conclusions:

  • Cardiac rehabilitation programs are economically beneficial.
  • The proven cost-effectiveness supports the implementation of these programs by public administration and private insurance providers.