Related Experiment Videos
A question of foot dominance
1Department of Kinesiology, Texas A & M University-College Station 77843-4243, USA. cpg8800@acs.ramu.edu
The Journal of General Psychology
|October 1, 1996
Summary
The common definition of foot dominance needs reevaluation. Understanding functional footedness characteristics is crucial for future research and assessment methods.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Motor Control
- Human Movement Science
Background:
- The popular definition of foot dominance often oversimplifies its functional role.
- Current understanding may not fully capture the complexity of footedness in actions like kicking a ball.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically re-examine the prevailing definition of foot dominance.
- To explore the functional characteristics of footedness beyond simple limb preference.
- To consider theoretical frameworks relevant to footedness.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and theoretical analysis of foot dominance.
- Conceptual re-evaluation of established definitions.
- Discussion of implications for research and assessment.
Main Results:
- The traditional definition, focusing on a dominant limb for action and a stabilizing nondominant limb, is deemed insufficient.
- Functional characteristics of footedness require a more nuanced understanding.
- Theoretical explanations offer insights into the complexities of footedness.
Conclusions:
- The definition of foot dominance requires reconsideration based on functional analysis.
- Future research designs and assessment methodologies should incorporate a broader understanding of footedness.
- A refined conceptualization is necessary for advancing the study of motor laterality.