Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: comments on Shanks and Lopez

M R Waldmann1, K J Holyoak

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany. waldmann@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de

Memory & Cognition
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Causal order does not influence cue selection, according to Shanks and Lopez (1996). However, their experimental methodology was flawed, suggesting human learning may indeed be guided by causal interpretation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning.

NeuroImage·2001
Same author

Estimating causal strength: the role of structural knowledge and processing effort.

Cognition·2001
Same author

The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Analogical priming via semantic relations.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving.

Memory & cognition·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning Science

Background:

  • Shanks and Lopez (1996) investigated whether causal order impacts cue selection in learning.
  • They concluded that causal order does not affect this process.
  • This study is re-examined for methodological rigor in testing causal learning.

Discussion:

  • The original study by Shanks and Lopez (1996) failed to meet essential methodological criteria.
  • These criteria include ensuring directed cause-effect interpretation, measuring causal knowledge, manipulating causal order, and controlling statistical relations.
  • Flaws in the experimental design limit the validity of their conclusions.

Key Insights:

  • Human contingency learning appears to be influenced by causal interpretation, contrary to Shanks and Lopez's findings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Causal-model theory better explains observed results than associative accounts.
  • Methodological rigor is crucial for accurately assessing the role of causal order in learning.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research is needed to refine methodologies for studying causal learning.
    • Understanding the role of causal interpretation in human learning requires robust experimental designs.
    • This re-evaluation contributes to a broader understanding of cognitive processes in causal inference.