Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coherency and connectivity in oscillating neural networks: linear partialization analysis

S Kalitzin1, B W van Dijk, H Spekreijse

  • 1Graduate School of Neurosciences Amsterdam, Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, Department of Visual Systems Analysis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Biological Cybernetics
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how synaptic connections influence neural network activity synchronization. Artificial neural networks show phase locking due to excitation or inhibition, with common inputs also affecting correlations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attachment in OCD: A meta-analysis.

Journal of anxiety disorders·2020
Same author

Functional and effective whole brain connectivity using magnetoencephalography to identify monozygotic twin pairs.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Brain (Hyper)Excitability Revealed by Optimal Electrical Stimulation of GABAergic Interneurons.

Brain stimulation·2016
Same author

Detecting epileptiform activity from deeper brain regions in spatially filtered MEG data.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2016
Same author

Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2014
Same author

Structural degree predicts functional network connectivity: a multimodal resting-state fMRI and MEG study.

NeuroImage·2014

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding neural network dynamics is crucial for neuroscience and AI.
  • Synaptic connectivity shapes network behavior and information processing.
  • Oscillatory activity and synchronization are key features of neural systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between synaptic connections in artificial neural networks and their spiking activity correlations.
  • To analyze how excitation, inhibition, and common inputs affect network synchronization.
  • To determine if synaptic information can be extracted from correlated activity despite common input.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling artificial neural networks with realistic non-oscillatory neuron dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing network behavior, including oscillatory activity and phase locking.
  • Employing cross-correlation functions and linear partialization to assess connectivity and common input effects.
  • Investigating network responses to periodic external inputs.

    • Main Results:

    • Both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections induce phase locking in network oscillations.
    • Mutual excitation leads to zero phase lag synchronization; mutual inhibition results in anti-phase synchronization.
    • Correlated external inputs (common input) also drive network activity correlations.
    • Synaptic connectivity information can be retrieved from cross-correlation functions using linear partialization, even with common input, provided input frequency is below a characteristic network oscillator frequency.
    • Network responses to periodic external input depend on input frequency relative to a threshold, influencing burst frequency and synchronization.

    Conclusions:

    • Synaptic interactions fundamentally govern the synchronization patterns (phase locking, zero/anti-phase lag) of artificial neural networks.
    • Linear partialization is an effective method for decoding synaptic influences from network activity, even in the presence of common inputs, within specific frequency constraints.
    • The identified frequency threshold, linked to intrinsic network oscillations, dictates both network response patterns and the efficacy of connectivity analysis.