Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Techniques in evaluating nursing expert systems: A case study

W T Harding1, R T Redmond, M C Corley

  • 1College of Business, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.

Nursing Forum
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Second cancers and late mortality in Australian children treated by allogeneic HSCT for haematological malignancy.

Leukemia·2014
Same author

Pneumoencephaly following lumbar puncture in association with an ethmoidal osteoma and porencephalic cyst.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2007
Same author

Directed evolution of enzymes for biocatalysis and the life sciences.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2004
Same author

Lifestyle and health status in long-term cardiac transplant recipients.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2001
Same author

Hostility toward caregivers as a selection criterion for transplantation.

Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)·2001
Same author

Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale.

Journal of advanced nursing·2001
Same journal

Occupational Stress: A Concept Analysis with Implications for Immigrant Workers' Mental Health in the United States.

Nursing forum·2023
Same journal

Perceptions of health and illness among older Hispanic adults.

Nursing forum·2022
Same journal

Spiritual comfort, spiritual support, and spiritual care: A simultaneous concept analysis.

Nursing forum·2022
Same journal

How, scholar, do you want to be remembered by future generations?: Finding your own balance between the ownership of knowledge and the freedom to pursue economic interests.

Nursing forum·2022
Same journal

Social integration: A concept analysis.

Nursing forum·2022
Same journal

"Nurses are every bit of the flow:" Emergency department nurses' conceptualization of patient flow management.

Nursing forum·2022
See all related articles

Evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) expert systems for nursing diagnosis is challenging. This study found that AI systems can outperform nurses in some diagnostic tasks, while nurses excel in others, aiding system selection.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems

Background:

  • Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) expert systems in nursing diagnostics presents significant challenges.
  • The integration of AI into clinical decision-making requires robust methods for assessing system performance against human expertise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the problems in evaluating nursing diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) expert systems.
  • To compare the diagnostic capabilities of experienced and beginning nurses with AI expert systems.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted two experiments with a computer-based AI expert system (N=49).
  • Experiment 1 ('white box', n=9) compared experienced Registered Nurses' (RNs) diagnostic techniques against the AI system's programmed techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 ('black box', n=40) compared diagnostic results from beginning nurses against the AI system's results.
  • Main Results:

    • The AI expert system demonstrated superior performance in some diagnostic scenarios.
    • Nurses, in certain cases, outperformed the AI system in diagnostic accuracy.
    • Performance varied between experienced and beginning nurses when compared to the AI system.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed evaluation techniques enhance nurses' ability to assess and select appropriate AI expert systems.
    • Effective evaluation is crucial for the successful implementation of AI in computer-assisted nursing diagnosis.
    • Findings suggest a collaborative approach where AI supports, rather than replaces, nursing judgment.