Related Experiment Videos
High spinal anesthesia does not alter experimental myocardial infarction size or ischemic preconditioning
R Haessler1, R A Wolff, G L Chien
1Department of Anesthesiology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
Objective:
The role of the central nervous system in the development of myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation in virgin and ischemically preconditioned myocardium was investigated.
Design:
Infarct size and ventricular arrhythmias were assessed after regional ischemia-reperfusion. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: (1) preconditioned, central nervous system intact; (2) nonpreconditioned, nervous system intact; (3) preconditioned, nervous system blocked; and (4) nonpreconditioned, nervous system blocked. Differences in hemodynamics and infarct size were assessed with analysis of variance, and differences in ventricular fibrillation were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Setting:
Experiments were performed in the Anesthesiology Research Laboratory at a medical center.
Participants:
Anesthetized open-chest New Zealand white rabbits were used for these studies.
Interventions:
Rabbits underwent 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 3 hours of reperfusion. The central nervous system was blocked with total spinal anesthesia. Ischemic preconditioning was elicited with 5 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 10 minutes of reperfusion. Infarction was assessed with tetrazolium and expressed as a percentage of the risk zone (mean +/- SEM).
Measurements And Main Results:
Preconditioning resulted in infarct size limitation compared with the control (8% +/- 4% v 43% +/- 5%; p < 0.001) and delayed the onset of fibrillation (15.5 minutes v 11 minutes; p = 0.001). Spinal blockade neither altered nonpreconditioned infarct size nor attenuated preconditioning (32% +/- 7% v 8% +/- 3%; p = 0.04), but it was associated with ventricular fibrillation in 24/25 rabbits as compared with 6/14 rabbits without blockade. In blocked animals, preconditioning resulted in a decreased duration of fibrillation (2.5 minutes v 12.5 minutes; p = 0.0004). However, spinal blockade eliminated the preconditioning-induced delay in fibrillation (10 minutes v 12 minutes; p = NS).
Conclusions:
It is concluded that (1) activation of efferent sympathetic nerves is not necessary for ischemic preconditioning; (2) preconditioning delays the onset of ventricular arrhythmias; and (3) spinal blockade exacerbates ischemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias.