Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal

D A Hale1, M Molloy, R H Pearl

  • 1Quality Assurance Office, Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), Washington, D.C., USA.

Annals of Surgery
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public Health Considerations in Ireland's Deposit Return Scheme.

Irish medical journal·2026
Same author

Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students.

Nurse education in practice·2017
Same author

Antimicrobial-resistant Faecal Organisms in Algae Products Marketed as Health Supplements.

Irish medical journal·2017
Same author

High risk HPV testing following treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Irish journal of medical science·2015
Same author

Overexpression of protein S100A4 is independently associated with overall survival in stage C colonic cancer but only in cytoplasm at the advancing tumour front.

International journal of colorectal disease·2012
Same author

Oral administration of penicillin in pediatrics.

American journal of diseases of children (1911)·2010
Same journal

Real-world Safety and Performance of the Symani Surgical System® in Microsurgical Reconstructive Procedures: Primary Results from the PRIMO Study.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

Revisiting Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation from Donors After Circulatory Death in the Era of Machine Perfusion Technologies: A US Nationwide Analysis of 10,687 Cases.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

The International Medical Graduate Paradox.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

Defining the Incremental Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Assessing Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

Trends in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Adolescents with Severe Obesity.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

The Ambulatory Surgery Center Paradox: Why 60% of Surgeries Occur Where 2% of AI Research Happens.

Annals of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Appendicitis perforation and negative appendectomy rates remain unchanged despite advances, influenced by factors beyond technology. Complications and mortality are linked to perforation, with higher risks in very young and older patients.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Practice
  • Gastroenterology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Appendicitis remains a common surgical emergency.
  • Appendectomy is the standard treatment for appendicitis.
  • Understanding current trends in appendicitis and appendectomy is crucial for surgical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of appendicitis and appendectomy practices in the 1990s.
  • To analyze patient demographics, diagnostic accuracy, and outcomes.
  • To identify factors influencing perforation and negative appendectomy rates.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 4950 appendectomies performed in Department of Defense hospitals worldwide.
  • Data collected over a 12-month period ending January 31, 1993.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis included patient age, sex, diagnosis, operative factors, and complications.
  • Main Results:

    • The median age of patients was 23 years, with 64% males.
    • Diagnoses included normal appendix (13%), acute appendicitis (66%), and perforated appendicitis (21%).
    • Perforation risk increased in patients ≤8 years and ≥45 years; females had higher normal appendix rates and lower perforation rates. Preoperative temperature and leukocyte count did not reliably differentiate appendicitis from normal appendices. Complications were higher in perforated cases, with a mortality rate of 0.08%.

    Conclusions:

    • Appendicitis perforation and negative appendectomy rates have not changed significantly despite technological advancements.
    • Factors influencing these rates are not solely dependent on intervening technology.
    • Mortality associated with appendicitis has decreased substantially over 50 years.