Related Experiment Videos
The GAF and psychiatric outcome: a descriptive report
1Pine Rest Christian Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49501-0165, USA.
Community Mental Health Journal
|February 1, 1997
Summary
The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) is widely used but under-researched. This study found GAF ratings improved significantly from admission to discharge in psychiatric patients, but noted potential issues with its unclear instructions.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Healthcare Assessment
Background:
- The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) has been a standard clinical tool since its introduction in DSM-III-R.
- Despite widespread use, the GAF has been minimally researched, particularly regarding its application in routine clinical practice.
- Previous research has not fully explored the GAF's reliability and validity across diverse patient populations and treatment settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the application and outcomes of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) in routine psychiatric clinical practice.
- To assess changes in patient functioning levels as measured by the GAF from admission to discharge.
- To identify potential factors influencing GAF ratings, such as patient demographics and the scale's instructional clarity.
Main Methods:
- Clinicians administered the GAF to adult inpatients, adult day hospital patients, and adolescent inpatients.
- GAF ratings were collected at both admission and discharge from psychiatric treatment.
- Statistical analyses were performed to compare GAF scores between admission and discharge, and between adult and adolescent samples.
Main Results:
- All patient groups (adult inpatients, adult day hospital patients, adolescent inpatients) showed statistically significant improvements in functioning from admission to discharge.
- Significant differences in mean dysfunction levels were observed between adult and adolescent samples at both admission and discharge.
- Hypothesized discrepancies in GAF ratings may stem from the scale's unclear instructional format.
Conclusions:
- The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) demonstrates sensitivity to change in psychiatric patients, reflecting clinical improvement.
- Differences in GAF scores between adult and adolescent populations suggest potential demographic influences or interpretation variations.
- The study highlights the need for clearer GAF instructions to enhance consistency and reliability in clinical assessments, with findings likely applicable to DSM-IV.