Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Categorical relations in shape perception

J E Hummel1, B J Stankiewicz

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1563, USA. jhummel@psych.ucla.edu

Spatial Vision
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Connectedness and part-relation integration in shape category learning.

Memory & cognition·1998
Same author

The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998
Same author

Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998
Same author

Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·1996
Same author

Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition.

Psychological review·1992
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Humans perceive objects based on the categorical relationships between their parts, not their precise 2D or 3D coordinates. This finding holds true even with extended viewing or specific training, highlighting structural perception in object recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Vision
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Object perception theories debate whether humans process structural descriptions (categorical relations of parts) or 2D views (spatial coordinates).
  • Understanding object configuration perception is crucial for fields like artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test competing theories of object configuration perception: structural descriptions versus 2D views.
  • To investigate how the brain processes the spatial and categorical relationships of object features.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted involving object recognition tasks.
  • Participants learned to identify target objects and distinguish them from distractors varying in categorical relations or spatial coordinates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Object similarity was manipulated in terms of both feature relations and feature coordinates.

    • Main Results:

    • Subjects consistently confused objects with similar part relations more than objects with similar coordinates.
    • This effect persisted regardless of viewing time or explicit training to differentiate based on coordinates.
    • Both 2D and 3D object perception demonstrated a bias towards relational similarity.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings strongly support the structural description account of object perception.
    • Human visual system prioritizes categorical feature relationships over precise spatial coordinates for object recognition.
    • A preliminary model is proposed to explain the observed bias towards categorical perception.