Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: a reevaluation?

E M Reingold1, M J Wainwright

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. reingold@psych.toronto edu

Consciousness and Cognition
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

This study clarifies misrepresentations in a commentary on response bias correction within the process dissociation procedure. We address substantive issues and inconsistencies in their argument regarding this cognitive psychology method.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements.

Memory & cognition·2002
Same author

Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: the effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: parallel encoding of chess relations.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking effects on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention.

Cognition·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometric Methods

Background:

  • The process dissociation procedure is a key method for assessing implicit memory and cognitive control.
  • Response bias can significantly influence the accuracy of results obtained from such procedures.
  • Previous analyses have attempted to correct for response bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address substantive issues and misrepresentations in a recent commentary.
  • To clarify inconsistencies in the commentary's position on response bias correction.
  • To defend the original analysis of response bias correction methods.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the commentary by Buchner and Erdfelder.
  • Re-examination of the issues raised by Wainwright and Reingold (1996).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clarification of methodological points concerning response bias correction.

    • Main Results:

    • The commentary failed to address the core substantive issues previously raised.
    • Inconsistencies were identified within the commentary's theoretical position.
    • Specific misrepresentations regarding the analysis of response bias were highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • The original analysis and its implications for response bias correction remain valid.
    • Further discussion is needed to resolve the substantive disagreements.
    • The commentary did not adequately engage with the critical points of the original analysis.