Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting DNA mixtures

B S Weir1, C M Triggs, L Starling

  • 1Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same author

Global diversity analysis of plant-associated <i>Pseudopithomyces</i> fungi reveals a new species producing the toxin associated with facial eczema in livestock: <i>Pseudopithomyces toxicarius sp. nov</i>.

Studies in mycology·2026
Same author

<i>Fusarium</i>: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell.

Studies in mycology·2021
Same author

The performance of the World Rugby Head Injury Assessment Screening Tool: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Sports medicine - open·2020
Same author

Improving the safety and tolerability of local anaesthetic outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies: A pilot study of the CAMbridge PROstate Biopsy (CAMPROBE) method.

Journal of clinical urology·2018
Same author

Phylogenetic relationships of eight new <i>Dacrymycetes</i> collected from New Zealand.

Persoonia·2017
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles

Interpreting mixed DNA stains using likelihood ratios provides a more accurate assessment of evidence. This approach accounts for the number of contributors, improving the reliability of forensic DNA analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Interpreting mixed DNA stains, profiles containing DNA from multiple individuals, presents a significant challenge in forensic science.
  • Traditional interpretation methods may not fully utilize all available genetic information, potentially leading to inaccurate conclusions.
  • The accurate assessment of DNA evidence is crucial for both prosecution and defense in legal proceedings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the interpretation of mixed DNA stains using the framework of likelihood ratios.
  • To evaluate the probabilities of mixed-stain profiles under various scenarios, including different numbers of contributors.
  • To address limitations of previous interpretation methods that rely solely on random match probabilities.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing likelihood ratios to evaluate mixed DNA profiles.
  • Considering alternative hypotheses specifying the number of contributors and profiles of known individuals.
  • Developing a general equation for calculating likelihood ratios, incorporating the '2p' modification from the 1996 NRC report.

Main Results:

  • Likelihood ratio-based interpretation provides a more comprehensive use of information compared to simple exclusion frequencies.
  • The number of contributors significantly impacts the interpretation, especially concerning allele presence at specific loci.
  • The '2p' modification, while intended to be conservative, is not universally so.

Conclusions:

  • Likelihood ratios offer a robust statistical framework for interpreting mixed DNA stains in forensic casework.
  • Accurate determination of the number of contributors is essential for reliable DNA evidence interpretation.
  • A computational tool is available to facilitate these complex likelihood ratio calculations.