Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery

P Kylén, J E Stjernvall, S Arlinger

    Acta Oto-Laryngologica
    |September 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On light-induced sneezing.

    Eye (London, England)·2009
    Same author

    Reference data for evaluation of occupationally noise-induced hearing loss.

    Noise & health·2005
    Same author

    Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people.

    International journal of audiology·2003
    Same author

    Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.

    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
    Same author

    Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
    Same author

    Cognitive effects in dichotic speech testing in elderly persons.

    Ear and hearing·2001

    Drill noise in ear surgery is mainly affected by burr size, with smaller burrs producing less noise. Minimizing drilling duration is key to preventing inner ear damage from harmful noise exposure.

    Area of Science:

    • Otolaryngology
    • Audiology
    • Surgical Instrumentation

    Background:

    • Drill-generated noise in ear surgery poses a risk of cochlear damage.
    • Understanding factors influencing noise levels is crucial for patient safety.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of rotation speed, burr type, burr size, and drilling site on bone-conducted noise levels during ear surgery.

    Main Methods:

    • Evaluated noise levels across different burr sizes (6 mm, 4 mm, 2 mm) and types (cutting, diamond).
    • Assessed the influence of rotation speed and drilling site on noise generation.
    • Measured noise levels in decibels (dB).

    Main Results:

    • Burr size was the primary determinant of noise levels; smaller burrs significantly reduced dB output.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Diamond burrs generated 5-11 dB lower noise levels than cutting burrs.
  • Rotation speed, burr type, and drilling site had minimal impact on noise levels (< 1.8 dB variation).

    • Conclusions:

    • Drill-induced noise in ear surgery is largely dictated by burr size.
    • Significant noise reduction is not achievable through current drilling parameters.
    • Minimizing drilling duration is essential to prevent noise-induced inner ear trauma.