Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A lognormal distribution-based exposure assessment method for unbalanced data

R H Lyles1, L L Kupper, S M Rappaport

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isoniazid-resistant TB and associated factors in Ethiopia.

Public health action·2025
Same author

Differential Misclassification of Disease under Partial-Mouth Sampling.

JDR clinical and translational research·2019
Same author

Investigation of liver binding of pentachlorophenol based upon measurement of protein adducts.

Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals·2013
Same author

Impact of vitamin D supplementation on markers of inflammation in adults with cystic fibrosis hospitalized for a pulmonary exacerbation.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2012
Same author

Leukemia-related chromosomal loss detected in hematopoietic progenitor cells of benzene-exposed workers.

Leukemia·2012
Same author

Isolation and identification of a direct-acting mutagen in diesel-exhaust particulates.

Environmental science & technology·2012
Same journal

Response to Article by Prof. Hans Kromhout, Hygiene Without Numbers.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Development of an Interception Glove Sampler for Skin Exposures to Aromatic Isocyanates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

When Are Risk Analyses on Job Titles Informative?

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Differential Counting of Asbestos Using Phase Contrast and Fluorescence Microscopy.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 1-Particle Size Selection Performance.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
See all related articles

This study introduces a new statistical method to assess occupational exposures, accounting for worker variability. The approach handles unbalanced data, improving the evaluation of long-term exposure risks and intervention strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Biostatistics
  • Industrial Hygiene

Background:

  • Existing statistical methods for occupational exposure assessment often fail to adequately account for both between- and within-worker variability.
  • There is a need for robust statistical approaches that can handle unbalanced exposure data, which is common in real-world occupational settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a generalized statistical methodology for assessing occupational exposures that explicitly incorporates between- and within-worker variability.
  • To provide a framework for hypothesis testing focused on the probability of exceeding an occupational exposure limit (OEL).
  • To offer a statistical approach for determining intervention strategies when exposure levels are unacceptable.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a statistical model for shift-long occupational exposures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the methodology to unbalanced exposure datasets, where workers have varying numbers of measurements.
  • Focus on hypothesis testing concerning the probability of an individual worker's long-term mean exposure exceeding the OEL.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed methodology effectively generalizes existing statistical approaches by accounting for multiple sources of exposure variability.
    • The method is applicable to unbalanced exposure data, enhancing its practical utility in occupational health surveillance.
    • Demonstrated practical advantages and comparable performance to existing methods using real-world data from the nickel-producing industry.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented statistical methodology offers significant practical advantages for assessing occupational exposures, particularly with unbalanced data.
    • The approach provides a more comprehensive evaluation of exposure risks and supports informed decision-making regarding intervention strategies.
    • This generalized method enhances the ability to accurately monitor and manage workplace exposures across various industries.