Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative Study in Laparoscopic Oophorectomy

Papasakelariou1, Saunders, De La Rosa A

  • 1Chairman, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, St. Joseph Hospital, 1315 Calhoun, Suite 1300, Houston, TX 77002.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic oophorectomy is a safe, cost-effective procedure with shorter hospital stays compared to laparotomy. However, it involves longer operative times.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

London Journals-Creosote in Tooth Ache.

The Western journal of the medical and physical sciences·2023
Same author

A retrospective analysis of palliative colonic stent placement in an elderly population.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2013
Same author

Complacency or ignorance about rectal bleeding?

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2013
Same author

Histone deacetylase inhibitors: novel anticancer agents.

Expert opinion on investigational drugs·2001
Same author

A discotic disguised as a smectic: A hybrid columnar bragg glass

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

Detection and distribution of insertion sequence 1 (IS1)-containing bacteria in the freshwater environment(1).

FEMS microbiology ecology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Oophorectomy is a common gynecological procedure.
  • Traditional laparotomy approaches can lead to longer hospital stays and higher costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare laparoscopic oophorectomy with laparotomy in terms of cost, hospital stay, and operative time.
  • To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic oophorectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 57 patients undergoing oophorectomy between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1992.
  • Comparison of 26 laparoscopic procedures with 31 laparotomy procedures.
  • Analysis of total hospital cost, hospital length of stay, and operative time.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic oophorectomy resulted in significantly lower mean hospital costs ($6,139) compared to laparotomy ($7,053).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hospital stay was significantly shorter for laparoscopy (1.07 days) versus laparotomy (3.87 days).
  • Operative time was significantly longer for laparoscopy (175.23 minutes) compared to laparotomy (136.94 minutes).

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic oophorectomy is a safe, successful, and cost-effective alternative to laparotomy.
    • The benefits of reduced hospital stay and cost outweigh the longer operative time associated with laparoscopy.