Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Office Microlaparoscopy Under Local Anesthesia

Palter1, Duleba, Zreik

  • 1Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of folliculin on acid-soluble plasma phosphorus in ducks.

Comptes rendus des seances de la Societe de biologie et de ses filiales·2010
Same author

Symmetry breaking and dynamical independence in a multimode laser

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics·2000
Same author

Disorders of Sinus Function.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine·2000
Same author

Global coupling with time delay in an array of semiconductor lasers

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

Trends in reproductive, smoking, and other chronic disease risk factors by birth cohort in a large occupational study.

Annals of epidemiology·2000
Same author

Mortality among radiologic technologists in the united states (1926-1997). 2(nd) Follow up.

Annals of epidemiology·2000
Same journal

Does a minimally invasive surgery fellowship impact surgical experience among gynecology residents?

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Chronic pelvic pain.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Body piercing affecting laparoscopy: perioperative precautions.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Ureteral endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Trocar-assisted sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence: three-year follow-up.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

New helical incision for removal of large uteri during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
See all related articles

Office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia is a well-tolerated, cost-effective procedure for infertility and chronic pelvic pain (CPP). This minimally invasive technique offers high patient satisfaction with no complications, reducing costs by over 70%.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery
  • Office-Based Procedures

Background:

  • Traditional laparoscopy for gynecological conditions often requires general anesthesia and a longer recovery period.
  • There is a need for cost-effective and well-tolerated alternatives for diagnostic and therapeutic gynecological procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility, patient tolerance, and cost-effectiveness of office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia.
  • To assess patient satisfaction and pain levels associated with microlaparoscopy for infertility and chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study of 100 women undergoing office microlaparoscopy (<2 mm instruments) under local anesthesia for infertility, CPP, or second-look procedures.
  • Patient tolerance, pain (McGill pain inventory), satisfaction, and recovery were assessed via questionnaires and screening.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Procedure and recovery times were meticulously recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Office microlaparoscopy was associated with high patient satisfaction and no complications, with no need for general anesthesia.
    • Second-look procedures were more painful than diagnostic ones; women with CPP reported greater pain than those with infertility.
    • A cost reduction of over 70% was observed compared to traditional laparoscopy.

    Conclusions:

    • Office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia is a safe, effective, and highly satisfactory alternative for selected gynecological procedures.
    • This minimally invasive approach significantly reduces costs and offers a favorable option for patients with infertility and chronic pelvic pain.