Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microlaparoscopy

Zupi1, Marconi, Solima

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of "Tor Vergata," Policlinico S. Eugenio, Viale Umanesimo 10, 00144 Rome, Italy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamics of a microcapillary discharge plasma using a soft x-ray laser backlighter

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics·2000
Same author

Nuclear and coulomb interaction in 8B breakup at sub-coulomb energies

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

Transfer and/or breakup modes in the 6He+209Bi reaction near the coulomb barrier

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: gel-layer behaviour, mechanisms and optimal performance.

Pharmaceutical science & technology today·2000
Same author

Charge-transfer interactions in face-to-face porphyrin-fullerene systems: solvent-dependent luminescence in the infrared spectral region

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2000
Same author

The RR Lyrae Star U Comae as a Test for Nonlinear Pulsation Models.

The Astrophysical journal·2000
Same journal

Does a minimally invasive surgery fellowship impact surgical experience among gynecology residents?

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Chronic pelvic pain.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Body piercing affecting laparoscopy: perioperative precautions.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Ureteral endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Trocar-assisted sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence: three-year follow-up.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

New helical incision for removal of large uteri during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
See all related articles

Diagnostic office laparoscopy using a 1.9-mm microlaparoscope is a safe and effective method for evaluating pelvic conditions in women. This minimally invasive approach offers a fast, inexpensive alternative for diagnosing infertility, pelvic pain, and uterine abnormalities.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Diagnostic Procedures

Background:

  • Diagnostic laparoscopy is a common procedure for evaluating gynecological conditions.
  • Minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce patient discomfort and recovery time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of office-based diagnostic laparoscopy using a 1.9-mm microlaparoscope.
  • To assess the indications and outcomes of this minimally invasive diagnostic tool.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy-five women underwent office laparoscopy under local anesthesia with a 1.9-mm microlaparoscope.
  • Indications included infertility, pelvic pain, and uterine malformations.
  • Procedure duration and visualization quality were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The procedure was well-tolerated by all patients.
  • Pelvic organs were evaluated in all but two cases due to adhesions.
  • Visualization was reasonable, though image size was smaller than standard laparoscopy.
  • Operating time ranged from 10 to 20 minutes.

Conclusions:

  • Office laparoscopy with a microlaparoscope is a safe, simple, effective, fast, and inexpensive method for pelvic disease evaluation.
  • It allows for histologic sampling and is suitable for diagnosing various gynecological conditions.