Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical methods for studying multiple primary malignant neoplasms

B S Schoenberg, M H Myers

    Cancer
    |October 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Design and evolution of the data management systems in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

    Controlled clinical trials·2001
    Same author

    Delirium episodes during the course of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease.

    Journal of the National Medical Association·2000
    Same author

    Genetic disease in offspring of long-term survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer.

    American journal of human genetics·1998
    Same author

    Cross-cultural cognitive examination: validation of a dementia screening instrument for neuroepidemiological research.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1993
    Same author

    Prevalence of headache and migrainous headache in Nigerian Africans: a community-based study.

    East African medical journal·1992
    Same author

    Clinical risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: a population-based case-control study.

    Neurology·1991
    Same journal

    Real-world effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens after immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma in Spain: Results from the GEM1801 study.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Bendamustine in indolent lymphoma: Letting the dust settle down.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Top advances of the year: Bispecific antibodies in early lines of therapy in multiple myeloma.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with cancer by anticoagulation quality.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Sexual orientation and gender identity based disparities in colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening in the United States.

    Cancer·2026
    Same journal

    Toward exercise as standard care for older cancer survivors.

    Cancer·2026
    See all related articles

    Establishing criteria for multiple primary malignant neoplasms is crucial. Tumor registries and statistical methods like the person-years approach help identify associations, but data quality and bias must be critically assessed.

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Multiple primary malignant neoplasms require clear definitions and documentation.
    • Tumor registries are vital for identifying cases and enabling comparisons.
    • Establishing a statistically significant association between neoplasms is key.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline criteria for defining and documenting multiple primary malignant neoplasms.
    • To highlight the role of tumor registries in cancer research.
    • To explain methods for assessing the significance of co-occurring tumors.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of case reports and case series on multiple primary cancers.
    • Utilization of tumor registry data for case identification and comparison.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the person-years approach for comparing observed and expected subsequent primary cancers.

    • Main Results:

    • Criteria for defining multiple primary malignant neoplasms have been established.
    • Tumor registries facilitate the identification of sufficient cases for analysis.
    • Statistical methods allow for the comparison of observed versus expected cancer occurrences.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous statistical analysis is necessary to prove significant associations between neoplasms.
    • The person-years approach aids in evaluating the risk of subsequent primary cancers.
    • Critical evaluation of data quality and potential biases is essential before concluding biologic significance.