Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics

Y Nimkarn1, P G Miles

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics: Do they deliver what they claim?

Australian dental journal·2009
Same author

A clinical comparison of two chemically-cured adhesives used for indirect bonding.

Journal of orthodontics·2003
Same author

A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.

Australian orthodontic journal·2001
Same author

Dentistry's role in obstructive sleep apnoea. Review and case report.

Australian dental journal·1996
Same author

Craniofacial structure and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome--a qualitative analysis and meta-analysis of the literature.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·1996
Same author

Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients: long-term surgical stability.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1995
Same journal

Elliptic Fourier analysis of facial profiles during growth and development.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
Same journal

Neuromuscular evaluation of post-orthodontic stability: an experimental protocol.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
Same journal

Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
Same journal

3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3D CT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. A pilot study.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
Same journal

Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
Same journal

Blood transfusions in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: are they necessary?

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·2003
See all related articles

Computerized cephalometry is reliable for most measurements, but point B can be inaccurate vertically. Horizontal measurements showed slight magnification compared to traditional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Computerized cephalometric analysis is increasingly used in dental research and clinical practice.
  • Ensuring the reliability of this digital methodology is crucial for accurate diagnostic and treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of a computerized cephalometric analysis.
  • To compare digital measurements with conventional hand-measured cephalometrics.

Main Methods:

  • A customized cephalometric analysis was performed on 40 radiographs using 22 landmarks and 40 measurements.
  • Reproducibility was assessed for each step of the computerized process.
  • Digital measurements were compared against conventional hand-measured values.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Computerized cephalometric measurements were reproducible for most parameters.
  • Point B showed unreliability in the vertical plane.
  • Horizontal measurements were consistently larger (0.7–1.0 mm) with the computerized method, suggesting horizontal magnification.

Conclusions:

  • Computerized cephalometry demonstrates good reproducibility for most parameters.
  • Clinicians and researchers should be aware of potential horizontal magnification and vertical unreliability at specific landmarks when interpreting data.
  • Further refinement may be needed to address identified discrepancies for optimal clinical application.