Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients

P L Wah1, M S Cooke, U Hägg

  • 1Department of Children's Dentistry and Orthodontics, The University of Hong Kong Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Hong Kong.

The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mycosporine-like amino acids: does Nature make a better sunscreen?

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Corrigendum to "European contribution to the study of ROS: A summary of the findings and prospects for the future from the COST action BM1203 (EU-ROS)" [Redox Biol. 13 (2017) 94-162].

Redox biology·2017
Same author

Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low-level summer sunlight exposures.

The British journal of dermatology·2016
Same author

Does nausea and vomiting of pregnancy play a role in the association found between maternal caffeine intake and fetal growth restriction?

Maternal and child health journal·2012
Same author

3D CBCT McNamara's cephalometric analysis in an adult southern Chinese population.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2011
Same author

Search for diphoton events with large missing transverse energy in 6.3  fb(-1) of pp collisions at √s=1.96  TeV.

Physical review letters·2011

This study found that cephalometric measurement accuracy is not affected by severe skeletal disharmonies. Reproducibility of cephalometric analysis remains consistent across patients with minor and major skeletal variations.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Craniofacial Imaging
  • Skeletal Biology

Background:

  • Cephalometric analysis is crucial for diagnosing and planning orthodontic and orthognathic surgery.
  • The accuracy of cephalometric measurements may be influenced by the degree of skeletal disharmony.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify and compare the reproducibility of cephalometric measurements in adult patients with minor versus severe skeletal disharmonies.
  • To test the hypothesis that measurement errors increase with greater morphologic deviations.

Main Methods:

  • Two groups of 30 adult patients each (minor vs. severe skeletal disharmonies) were analyzed.
  • Cephalometric landmarks were digitized twice by one examiner with a 1-week interval.
  • Reproducibility of 30 angles and 9 distances was assessed using two-sample t-tests.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in landmark location or measurement reproducibility were found between the orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patient groups.
  • Intraexaminer method error was comparable across both groups, regardless of skeletal morphology severity.

Conclusions:

  • Extreme variations in skeletal morphology do not impact the accuracy of cephalometric evaluation.
  • Cephalometric analysis is a reliable diagnostic tool even in cases with significant skeletal disharmonies.