Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The ten test

B Strauch1, A Lang, M Ferder

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y., USA.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential susceptibility of Candida (Candidozyma) auris clades to surface disinfectants.

The Journal of hospital infection·2025
Same author

Refined high-content imaging-based phenotypic drug screening in zebrafish xenografts.

NPJ precision oncology·2023
Same author

KDM6A mutations promote acute cytoplasmic DNA release, DNA damage response and mitosis defects.

BMC molecular and cell biology·2021
Same author

Diversity at the core of all our work!

Laboratory animals·2021
Same author

Fire safety and emergency evacuation guidelines for intensive care units and operating theatres: for use in the event of fire, flood, power cut, oxygen supply failure, noxious gas, structural collapse or other critical incidents: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Intensive Care Society.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

Combining segmental bulk- and single-cell RNA-sequencing to define the chondrocyte gene expression signature in the murine knee joint.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2021
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new clinical sensibility test that reliably measures touch sensation. The test provides a valid ratio for assessing sensory changes, proving dependable for clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Assessment

Background:

  • Evaluating clinical sensibility is crucial for patient diagnosis and monitoring.
  • Existing methods for assessing tactile sensation can be time-consuming or lack reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel, rapid, and reliable test for evaluating clinical sensibility.
  • To establish a quantitative measure for assessing changes in tactile sensation over time.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new test measuring the ratio between normal and diminished light moving touch.
  • Comparison of obtained ratios with a standardized sensory scale.
  • Assessment of interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability and repeatability.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The test demonstrates a high degree of validity and reliability in assessing clinical sensibility.
  • Serial determinations using the test can effectively detect changes in sensation.
  • Interexaminer and intraexaminer results were found to be reliable and repeatable.

    • Conclusions:

    • The new sensibility test is a valid, reliable, and repeatable method for clinical use.
    • Its simplicity and dependability make it suitable for busy clinical environments.
    • The test provides a quantifiable ratio for tracking sensory deficits.