Related Experiment Videos
Biliary atresia: the King's College Hospital experience (1974-1995)
M Davenport1, N Kerkar, G Mieli-Vergani
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, England.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|March 1, 1997
Summary
Portoenterostomy surgery offers long-term success for about half of infants with biliary atresia. Early surgery age doesn't significantly impact survival, suggesting it shouldn't dictate treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Hepatology
Background:
- Biliary atresia is a severe neonatal liver disease requiring surgical intervention.
- Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving outcomes in infants with biliary atresia.
- Portoenterostomy is a primary surgical procedure for biliary atresia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the long-term survival outcomes of infants with biliary atresia treated with portoenterostomy.
- To evaluate the impact of age at surgery on survival rates in biliary atresia.
- To assess the effectiveness of portoenterostomy as a long-term treatment for biliary atresia.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 338 infants with biliary atresia treated between 1973 and 1995.
- Infants were stratified into three groups based on birth decade (1970s, 1980s, 1990s).
- Surgical outcomes including survival, need for liver transplantation, and age at surgery were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Overall survival at last follow-up was 50%, with 23% undergoing liver transplantation and 26% mortality.
- Five-year actuarial survival improved from the 1980s (50%) to the 1990s (60%).
- A significant decrease in median age at surgery was observed over the decades, but age at surgery did not significantly predict 5-year outcomes for infants treated since 1980.
Conclusions:
- Portoenterostomy is an effective long-term procedure for 40-50% of infants with biliary atresia.
- The remaining 50-60% of infants will likely require liver transplantation, often within 2 years of age.
- Age at surgery has limited predictive value for survival after portoenterostomy and should not dictate primary treatment.