Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding

S Vajda1, M Sippl, J Novotny

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington St, Boston, MA 02215, USA. vajda@enga.bu.edu

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Simplified protein models use basic noncovalent effects like hydrogen bonding and hydrophobicity for simulations. More complex models for protein-ligand binding include detailed solvation, improving free-energy calculations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gastric pH and Fusobacterium gastrosuis detection in relation to gastric lesions in fattening pigs.

Polish journal of veterinary sciences·2026
Same author

Observation of Radially Emitted Proton Beams from Low-Mass X-Pinch Plasmas.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Contemporary insights and evolving clinical pathways in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement.

Herz·2026
Same author

The guidelines for clinical practice for carriers of germline mutations in the Lynch syndrome predisposition genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and large deletions of EPCAM (4.2024).

Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti·2024
Same author

The guidelines for clinical practice for carriers of germline mutations in hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 (4.2024).

Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti·2024
Same author

Conplastic strains for identification of retrograde effects of mitochondrial dna variation on cardiometabolic traits in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Physiological research·2022

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Biophysics
  • Protein dynamics

Background:

  • Simplified models and empirical potentials are increasingly used in protein analysis, complementing or replacing traditional molecular mechanics.
  • Recent protein folding simulations utilize potentials focusing on polypeptide geometry, hydrogen bonding, and simplified hydrophobicity.
  • Existing potentials for protein-ligand complex free-energy ranking are more complex, incorporating detailed solvation models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare different solvation models used in protein-ligand free-energy calculations.
  • To highlight the strengths and potential weaknesses of various solvation approaches, including surface area, knowledge-based, and continuum electrostatics models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing literature on simplified protein potentials and solvation models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of different solvation models: surface area-based, knowledge-based, and continuum electrostatics.
  • Evaluation of the accuracy and potential limitations, such as double counting, in knowledge-based solvation approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Simplified potentials for protein folding focus on essential noncovalent interactions.
    • Protein-ligand free-energy calculations employ more sophisticated solvation models.
    • Common solvation models include surface area, knowledge-based, and continuum electrostatics.
    • Knowledge-based solvation methods, while practical, may risk double-counting free-energy contributions.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of solvation model significantly impacts the accuracy of protein-ligand free-energy calculations.
    • Further refinement of solvation models is needed to avoid potential biases like double counting.
    • Balancing simplicity and accuracy in computational models remains a key challenge in protein science.