Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields

J Moult1

  • 1Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. jmoult@indigo5.carb.nist.gov

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Database and molecular mechanics force fields for macromolecule studies show distinct pros and cons. Molecular mechanics offers theoretical depth but requires simplifications, while database potentials excel at structure discrimination but have controversial free energy links.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of the chemical and thermal denaturation of proteins by a two-state transition model.

Analytical biochemistry·2007
Same author

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV.

Proteins·2002
Same author

Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4.

Proteins·2002
Same author

Comparison of performance in successive CASP experiments.

Proteins·2002
Same author

Completeness in structural genomics.

Nature structural biology·2001
Same author

SNPs, protein structure, and disease.

Human mutation·2001

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Accurate structural modeling of macromolecules is crucial for understanding biological function.
  • Both database and molecular mechanics force fields are employed in macromolecular studies.
  • Evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of these force fields is essential for reliable predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of database and molecular mechanics force fields.
  • To assess their efficacy in distinguishing correct from incorrect macromolecular structures.
  • To identify areas for future development and testing.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of theoretical underpinnings and practical applications.
  • Evaluation of computational tractability and necessary simplifications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of structure discrimination capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Molecular mechanics force fields possess a strong theoretical basis but necessitate significant simplifications for computation, with limited testing at the macromolecular level.
    • Database potentials offer greater functional form flexibility and demonstrate effectiveness in discriminating correct from incorrect complete structures.
    • A key limitation of database potentials is their controversial relationship to free energy.

    Conclusions:

    • Both force field types have unique strengths and weaknesses for macromolecular structure studies.
    • Further testing and comparative analysis of database and molecular mechanics force fields are required.
    • Improved force fields will enhance the accuracy of macromolecular modeling and analysis.