Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement

R L Chatburn1

  • 1University Hospitals of Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

AANA Journal
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Understanding measurement errors, including systematic (bias) and random (imprecision), is crucial for operating life support equipment. Error intervals quantify total error, ensuring reliable technology evaluation for critical decisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes research in respiratory care.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

Decision analysis for large capital purchases: how to buy a ventilator.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

A new system for understanding modes of mechanical ventilation.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

Device evaluation: a critique.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

Electrical stimulation for swallowing disorders caused by stroke.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

Pediatric asthma disease management.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2000

Area of Science:

  • Measurement theory and scientific instrumentation.
  • Statistical analysis in experimental design.
  • Biomedical engineering and life support systems.

Background:

  • Accurate measurements are vital for safe operation of life support equipment and technology evaluation.
  • Measurement errors are categorized into systematic (bias) and random (imprecision).
  • Quantifying these errors is essential for assessing measurement system validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the fundamental concepts of measurement error and its quantification.
  • To outline appropriate statistical methods for evaluating new measurement technology.
  • To emphasize the importance of error analysis in device and method agreement studies.

Main Methods:

  • Defining systematic error (bias) and random error (imprecision).
  • Explaining the calculation and interpretation of error intervals (tolerance, inaccuracy, agreement).
  • Describing experimental design for inaccuracy and agreement studies, including data analysis steps.

Main Results:

  • Systematic error is the mean difference between measured and true values.
  • Random error is expressed as the standard deviation of measured values.
  • Total error can be predicted using error intervals based on bias and imprecision.

Conclusions:

  • Properly quantifying measurement errors is critical for reliable technology evaluation.
  • Statistical methods beyond simple correlation and regression are needed for instrument performance studies.
  • Understanding error intervals builds confidence in measurement systems used for critical decisions.

Related Experiment Videos