Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical and electrical interactions in bone remodeling

J A Spadaro1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York, Syracuse 13210, USA. spadaroj@vax.cs.hscyr.edu

Bioelectromagnetics
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Muscle indices do not fully account for enhanced upper extremity bone mass and strength in gymnasts.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2009
Same author

Density and structural changes in the bone of growing rats after weekly alendronate administration with and without a methotrexate challenge.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2006
Same author

Novel radioprotectant drugs for sparing radiation-induced damage to the physis.

International journal of radiation biology·2004
Same author

In vivo and in vitro effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field on net calcium flux in rat calvarial bone.

Calcified tissue international·2002
Same author

Amifostine before fractionated irradiation protects bone growth in rats better than fractionation alone.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2001
Same author

Sparing of radiation-induced damage to the physis: fractionation alone compared to amifostine pretreatment.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2000
Same journal

Computational Simulation and Experimental Validation of Electric Field Distribution Patterns in TTFields Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
Same journal

Effect of Magnetic Field on the Ability of Vibrational Iterations to Enhance ROS Production by Neutrophils.

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
Same journal

Measurements of Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Levels in EXPO2025 Osaka, Kansai, Japan.

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
Same journal

Monitoring Lipid Oxidation in Different Lipid Matrices by Dielectric Spectroscopy Using an Open-Ended Coaxial Probe.

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
Same journal

Exposure to 5G Radiofrequency and Physiological Effects in Healthy Young Adults: Insights Into Heart Rate Variability and Salivary Stress Biomarkers.

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
Same journal

A Ten-Country Study on Public Perceptions of 5G EMF Emissions: Who Feels Exposed, and Why?

Bioelectromagnetics·2026
See all related articles

Bone adaptation to mechanical forces does not require internal electrical currents. External electromagnetic fields may influence bone cells by modulating primary activators like hormones and growth factors.

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Skeletal Biology
  • Mechanobiology

Background:

  • Bone remodeling is a classic example of physical regulation in biology.
  • Bone adaptation mechanisms have intrigued scientists for over a century.
  • The link between electromagnetic fields and bone remodeling is known as "Yasuda's hypothesis".

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine the roles of endogenous and exogenous electromagnetic fields in bone response to mechanical forces.
  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying bone adaptation to mechanical loading.

Main Methods:

  • Review of experimental studies involving mechanical and electrical stimuli applied to implants in rabbit long bones.
  • Analysis of the effects of endogenous and exogenous electromagnetic fields on bone cells.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Endogenously generated electrical currents are not necessary for initiating mechanically stimulated bone formation.
  • Direct mechanical effects on bone cells appear to be the primary driver of bone adaptation.
  • Exogenous electromagnetic stimuli may modulate bone cell activity by influencing primary activators.

Conclusions:

  • Mechanically stimulated bone formation is primarily driven by direct mechanical effects on bone cells, not endogenous electrical currents.
  • Exogenous electromagnetic fields can influence bone cells, potentially by modulating key signaling pathways involving hormones, growth factors, and cytokines.