Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

F-wave: sample size and normative values

F Raudino1

  • 1Neurological Department, Valduce, Hospital, Como, Italy.

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Determining optimal F-wave analysis requires sufficient stimuli. For accurate mean latency, 20 stimuli suffice, but precise minimal latency and chronodispersion need 64-80 F-waves.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Report of Botrytis Blight on Medinilla magnifica and Various Species of Mandevilla and Allamanda in Italy.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Root and Crown Rot of Sage Caused by Phytophthora cryptogea in Italy.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Phytophthora palmivora on Coronilla valentina subsp. glauca in Italy.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Brown Rot and Wilt of Fennel Caused by Phytophthora megasperma in Italy.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Blight of English Ivy (Hedera helix) Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii in Sicily.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Wilt and Collapse of Cuphea ignea Caused by Phytophthora tropicalis in Italy.

Plant disease·2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • F-wave analysis is crucial for assessing peripheral nerve function.
  • Standardizing the number of stimuli for reliable F-wave parameter calculation is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the minimum number of F-wave stimuli required for accurate measurement of F-wave minimal latency (Fmin), mean latency (Fmean), and chronodispersion (CD).
  • To evaluate the impact of stimulus number on the reliability of F-wave electrophysiological parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded F-waves from the abductor digiti minimi in 60 healthy subjects (22-65 years).
  • Administered 80 supramaximal stimuli per subject.
  • Calculated Fmin, Fmean, and CD for cumulative sets of stimuli (10, 20, 30, etc.).
  • Compared calculated values with 'true' values derived from all 80 responses.

Main Results:

  • After 20 stimuli, Fmean latency was within 95% of the 'true' value in 95% of subjects.
  • After 20 stimuli, Fmin latency was within 95% of the 'true' value in 88% of subjects.
  • Chronodispersion consistently increased with the number of stimuli analyzed, necessitating 64-80 F-waves for careful evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Twenty F-wave stimuli are generally sufficient for reliable Fmean latency assessment.
  • Accurate Fmin latency and chronodispersion measurements require a larger number of stimuli (64-80 F-waves).
  • Stimulus number significantly impacts F-wave parameter reliability, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols.

Related Experiment Videos