Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Portable peak flow meters

J P McNaughton1

  • 1Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, Essex, UK.

The European Respiratory Journal. Supplement
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Portable peak flow meters vary in performance. Guidelines for minimum performance and testing are recommended to standardize these crucial respiratory monitoring devices. Further studies are suggested for mechanical testing and clinical trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of the effects of adding fish high or low in n-3 fatty acids to a diet conforming to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Journal of the American Dietetic Association·1993
Same author

Energy content of selected salad bar and hot serving line meals.

Journal of the American Dietetic Association·1985
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Pulmonary Function Testing

Background:

  • Multiple portable peak flow meters exist on the market.
  • These devices exhibit significant variability in their construction and performance characteristics.
  • Standardization is lacking across available peak flow meters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To recommend guidelines for the minimum performance standards of portable peak flow meters.
  • To establish a standardized testing procedure for evaluating peak flow meters.
  • To address the variability in construction and performance of these medical devices.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing portable peak flow meter designs and performance data.
  • Development of proposed guidelines for minimum performance criteria.
  • Recommendation of a standardized testing protocol for device evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant variations in the construction and performance of portable peak flow meters.
  • Proposed specific guidelines for minimum performance requirements.
  • Recommended a standardized testing procedure for consistent evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Guidelines for minimum performance and testing are essential for standardizing portable peak flow meters.
  • Further research, including mechanical test apparatus validation and clinical trials, is needed.
  • Standardization will improve the reliability and clinical utility of peak flow monitoring.

Related Experiment Videos