Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of linear and K-Amp circuits

R K Surr1, M T Cord, B E Walden

  • 1Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA.

Ear and Hearing
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Users found both Linear Class D and Class D with K-Amp hearing aid circuits equally beneficial for mild to moderate hearing loss. Subjective preference between these advanced hearing aid technologies was evenly split among participants.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.

Ear and hearing·2001
Same author

Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

Hearing aid benefit in patients with high-frequency hearing loss.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

The role of magnesium in the susceptibility of soldiers to noise-induced hearing loss.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1999

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Aid Technology
  • Signal Processing in Acoustics

Background:

  • Hearing aids are crucial for individuals with hearing loss.
  • Advancements in hearing aid circuitry aim to improve sound quality and user satisfaction.
  • Class D amplification offers potential benefits in efficiency and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare user preference between Linear Class D and Class D with K-Amp hearing aid circuits.
  • To assess the audibility and benefit of two distinct Class D amplification strategies.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 18 experienced hearing aid users.
  • Binaural hearing aids with Linear Class D and Class D with K-Amp circuits were tested over consecutive 30-day periods.
  • The Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (PHAB) questionnaire was used to quantify perceived benefit.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference was found in user preference between the Linear Class D and Class D with K-Amp circuits.
  • The PHAB scores indicated no significant difference in the perceived benefit provided by either circuit.
  • Individual preferences often aligned with the instruments that scored highest on specific subscales of the PHAB.

Conclusions:

  • Both Linear Class D and Class D with K-Amp circuits deliver significant benefits for mild to moderate hearing loss in daily listening situations.
  • There is no clear user preference for one circuit over the other, suggesting comparable performance and satisfaction.
  • Further research may explore specific listening conditions or user profiles that might favor one technology.

Related Experiment Videos