Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disclosure analysis procedures: reliability issues

K Hux1, D Sanger, R Reid

  • 1Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68503-0738, USA.

Journal of Communication Disorders
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An audit of trauma laparotomy in children and adolescents highlights the role of damage control surgery and the need for a trauma systems approach to injury in this vulnerable population.

South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie·2022
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK medical education. A nationwide student survey.

Medical teacher·2021
Same author

A once-monthly GLP-1 receptor agonist for treatment of diabetic cats.

Domestic animal endocrinology·2019
Same author

Impacts of Coastal Development on the Ecology of Tidal Creek Ecosystems of the US Southeast including Consequences to Humans.

Estuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation·2019
Same author

Alveolar Hemorrhage Compress.

The American journal of dental science·2019
Same journal

Using a self-efficacy framework in the management of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO): A tutorial with illustrative case scenarios.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Reframing Ableism in stuttering: advancing research, practice, and dialogue.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
Same journal

State of the art in speech perception assessment.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Clinicians' perspectives and experiences on using consistent terminology in speech-language pathology: A qualitative study.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Divergent Cognitive-Linguistic Mechanisms in Mandarin Sentence Recognition: The Impact of F0 Contour and Noise in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Speech-language service utilization by families with young children: The role of social determinants of health.

Journal of communication disorders·2026
See all related articles

Reliability in discourse analysis is crucial for accurate assessments. This study found that common reliability measures like interobserver agreement can be misleading, especially when not accounting for chance or behavior frequency, impacting diagnostic value.

Area of Science:

  • Speech and Language Pathology
  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical Linguistics

Background:

  • Reliable discourse analysis is essential for effective assessment and intervention planning in speech-language pathology.
  • Previous research highlights the need to rigorously evaluate the reliability of clinical assessment procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare four statistical methods for assessing the reliability of a modified Clinical Discourse Analysis procedure.
  • To determine the suitability of different reliability metrics for capturing true agreement in discourse analysis.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed Pearson product-moment correlations, interobserver agreement percentages, Cohen's kappa, and generalizability coefficients.
  • These methods were applied to assess the reliability of a modified version of Damico's Clinical Discourse Analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • High correlation coefficients and interobserver agreement were observed when error types were not considered.
  • Cohen's kappa and agreement percentages for target behaviors indicated that much agreement was due to chance, particularly with infrequent target behaviors.
  • Generalizability coefficients showed moderate reliability for differentiating language competency in some areas, but overall scores were insufficient for diagnostic purposes.

Conclusions:

  • Standard reliability measures like interobserver agreement can overestimate consistency in discourse analysis if not carefully applied.
  • Cohen's kappa and generalizability coefficients offer a more nuanced understanding of reliability, highlighting limitations for diagnostic differentiation.
  • The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate reliability metrics to ensure the validity of clinical discourse analysis.