Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results

J W Bishop1, J S Hartinger, G F Pawlick

  • 1Department of Pathology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

Acta Cytologica
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Night Vision in the Army.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation.

Acta cytologica·2000
Same author

New technologies in gynecologic cytology.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2000
Same author

Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines.

Acta cytologica·2000
Same author

AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2000
Same author

A task-targeted automation system: a case study.

Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·2000
Same journal

Cytological Features of CIC-rearranged Sarcoma. A Report of 5 New Cases and Review of the Literature.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Pericardial Fluid Metastatic Tumor Distribution and Fluid Volume Analysis, a 10-Year Institutional Experience.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

The cytopathology of infectious disease: A review.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Investigation of a storage method for peritoneal and pleural effusion cytology specimens for long-term preservation of antigenicity in immunocytochemical staining.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Utility of endoscopic crush cytology in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Illuminating the Past to Understand the Present: The Life and Legacy of Ruth Moore Graham.

Acta cytologica·2026
See all related articles

Repeat cervical smears performed too soon after an initial abnormal result may be less accurate and misleading. Shorter intervals, especially under 45 days, reduce diagnostic sensitivity for cervical abnormalities.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic pathology
  • Cervical cancer screening

Background:

  • Second cervical smears at short intervals often show fewer abnormalities than the first.
  • The impact of time between repeat cervical smears on diagnostic accuracy requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of varying time intervals between cervical smears on diagnostic findings.
  • To compare the accuracy of repeat smears with concurrent biopsies across different time intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two large patient cohorts with at least two satisfactory cervical smears and one abnormal result (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater) or biopsy.
  • Patients categorized into four groups based on intervals between smears: <= 45 days, 46-90 days, 91-120 days, and > 120 days.
  • Statistical comparison of diagnostic results across these interval groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A statistically significant difference (P < .01) was observed between short-interval (< 120 days) and long-interval (> 120 days) smear results.
  • Repeat cervical smears obtained at short intervals demonstrated reduced sensitivity compared to initial smears and concurrent biopsies.
  • The diminished sensitivity was most pronounced for intervals less than 45 days.

Conclusions:

  • Rapidly repeated cervical smears exhibit poor concordance with biopsy results and can be misleading.
  • The reduced sensitivity of short-interval repeat smears, particularly those within 45 days, necessitates careful consideration.
  • Clinicians should weigh the utility of performing repeat cervical smears shortly after an abnormal finding due to potential loss of diagnostic sensitivity.