Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervicography. Does it improve cervical cancer screening?

J J Baldauf1, M Dreyfus, J Ritter

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France.

Acta Cytologica
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among French adolescents: A claims data study.

Vaccine·2024
Same author

Pectinase treatments on technical fibres of flax: Effects on water sorption and mechanical properties.

Carbohydrate polymers·2021
Same author

The Red Kangaroo pericardium as a material source for the manufacture of percutaneous heart valves.

Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes·2019
Same author

Corrigendum to "Increased levels of inflammatory plasma markers and obesity risk in a mouse model of Down syndrome" [Free Radic. Biol. Med. 114 (2018) 122-130].

Free radical biology & medicine·2018
Same author

Increased levels of inflammatory plasma markers and obesity risk in a mouse model of Down syndrome.

Free radical biology & medicine·2017
Same author

Microstructural alterations owing to handling of bovine pericardium to manufacture bioprosthetic heart valves: A potential risk for cusp dehiscence.

Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes·2017
Same journal

Predictive Immunohistochemical Biomarkers for Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy in Pulmonary Cytology.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

The Development Path of Gynecological Cytology after Papanicolaou: from Bethesda to Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Cytological Features of CIC-rearranged Sarcoma. A Report of 5 New Cases and Review of the Literature.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Pericardial Fluid Metastatic Tumor Distribution and Fluid Volume Analysis, a 10-Year Institutional Experience.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

The cytopathology of infectious disease: A review.

Acta cytologica·2026
Same journal

Investigation of a storage method for peritoneal and pleural effusion cytology specimens for long-term preservation of antigenicity in immunocytochemical staining.

Acta cytologica·2026
See all related articles

Cervicography is less reliable than cytology for cervical cancer screening, showing lower sensitivity and higher false positive rates. This study suggests cytology remains the preferred method for detecting cervical neoplasia.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Oncology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening is crucial for early detection and prevention.
  • Cytology (Pap smear) is the established standard for cervical screening.
  • Cervicography is a visual inspection method that has been explored as an adjunct or alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic reliability of cervicography versus cytology for cervical neoplasia detection.
  • To analyze the causes of false positive and false negative results for both methods.
  • To evaluate the combined utility of cytology and cervicography in cervical screening.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 1,709 patients undergoing routine screening, follow-up, or referral due to cytologic anomalies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlation of cervicography and cytology results with colpohistologic findings.
  • Analysis of diagnostic accuracy metrics including sensitivity and specificity.

    • Main Results:

    • Cervicography had a significantly higher rate of defective examinations (8.9% vs. 0.2%).
    • Cervicography demonstrated lower sensitivity (51% vs. 59%) and specificity (96% vs. 98%) compared to cytology.
    • Cervicography consistently yielded higher false positive and false negative rates, except in pregnant women.

    Conclusions:

    • Cervicography does not appear to be a valuable alternative to cytology for cervical cancer screening.
    • Cytology remains the more reliable method for detecting cervical neoplasia.
    • Further research may be needed to refine cervicography's role, if any, in cervical screening protocols.