Related Experiment Videos
A comparison of two prophylaxis angles: disposable and autoclavable
M C Dean1, D M Barnes, L W Blank
1Department of Dental Hygiene, University of Maryland at Baltimore 21201-1586, USA.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|April 1, 1997
Summary
The disposable prophylaxis angle demonstrated superior effectiveness in removing dental stain, plaque, and debris compared to the autoclavable prophylaxis angle during clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Dental hygiene
- Clinical dentistry
- Preventive dentistry
Background:
- Dental prophylaxis is crucial for oral hygiene.
- Traditional autoclavable prophylaxis angles are standard in dental practices.
- Evaluating newer, disposable alternatives is important for improving efficiency and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of disposable versus autoclavable prophylaxis angles in stain, plaque, and debris removal.
- To assess patient and dental hygienist acceptance of both types of prophylaxis angles.
Main Methods:
- A clinical trial involving 30 patients undergoing dental prophylaxis.
- Prophylaxis was performed by dental hygienists for up to 45 minutes.
- A blinded clinician evaluated pre- and post-prophylaxis stain, plaque, and debris levels.
- Statistical analysis using a matched pairs t-test (P < .05) was employed.
Main Results:
- Significantly less stain, plaque, and debris remained after using the disposable prophylaxis angle compared to the autoclavable angle.
- The study focused on objective measures of cleanliness.
Conclusions:
- Disposable prophylaxis angles are more effective for stain, plaque, and debris removal than autoclavable angles.
- This finding suggests potential benefits for disposable angles in clinical dental hygiene settings.