Related Experiment Videos
Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|April 1, 1997
Summary
This study investigated noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) for problem behavior. Findings show that starting NCR with a latency-based schedule and omitting extinction effectively reduced problem behaviors in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Behavior Analysis
- Developmental Disabilities
- Applied Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is a common treatment for problem behavior.
- Traditional NCR involves continuous access to reinforcers and extinction.
- Research is needed to examine the essential components of NCR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of an initial NCR schedule based on latency to problem behavior.
- To determine if extinction is an essential component of NCR treatment.
- To evaluate NCR's effectiveness in reducing problem behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Main Methods:
- A three-phase investigation was conducted.
- Phase 1: Functional analysis to identify maintaining reinforcers for problem behavior.
- Phase 2: Implemented NCR with an initial interval based on baseline latency.
- Phase 3: Implemented NCR without extinction.
Main Results:
- Functional analysis confirmed problem behavior was maintained by tangible reinforcement.
- The latency-based NCR schedule effectively reduced problem behavior.
- NCR without extinction also effectively reduced problem behavior.
- Both tested NCR variations were more effective than baseline.
Conclusions:
- An initial NCR schedule based on latency is effective.
- Extinction may not be an essential component of NCR for all cases.
- These findings offer valuable insights into optimizing NCR treatment protocols.