Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gradients as visual primitives

B Goodenough1, B Gillam

  • 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Failure to detect changes in color for lines rotating in depth: the effects of grouping and type of color change.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Stimulus eccentricity and spatial frequency interact to determine circular vection.

Perception·1999
Same author

Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Unravelling age effects and sex differences in needle pain: ratings of sensory intensity and unpleasantness of venipuncture pain by children and their parents.

Pain·1999
Same author

An investigation of the placebo effect and age-related factors in the report of needle pain from venipuncture in children.

Pain·1997

Texture gradients are not direct perceptual primitives. Our study shows that visual system anomalies in compression gradients are hard to detect, unlike linear perspective, suggesting they aren't fundamental visual features.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The prevailing assumption, following Gibson (1950), is that texture gradients are directly perceived as fundamental visual units.
  • However, research indicates a weaker depth perception response to compression gradients compared to linear perspective gradients.
  • This discrepancy suggests potential limitations in directly detecting the differential structure of compression gradients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether compression gradients are directly detected as perceptual primitives.
  • To test the hypothesis that the visual system lacks direct mechanisms for detecting compression gradient structures.
  • To explore the perceptual processing of gradient anomalies independent of depth perception tasks.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants' detection speed for gradient anomalies was measured.
  • The experiment varied the number of elements within the gradient.
  • The study examined responses to both compression and linear perspective gradients.

Main Results:

  • Gradient anomalies in linear perspective exhibited a 'pop-out' effect, indicating rapid detection.
  • Compression gradient anomalies did not 'pop-out', suggesting slower, more effortful processing.
  • The alignment of elements in linear perspective, not direct differential structure detection, drove the pop-out effect.

Conclusions:

  • Gradients, particularly compression gradients, are argued not to be perceptual primitives.
  • The findings explain the observed poor depth response to compression gradients across various contexts (e.g., motion parallax, stereo, perspective).
  • This research challenges established theories on texture gradient perception and visual feature detection.