Related Experiment Videos
Electronic nose for microbial quality classification of grains
A Jonsson1, F Winquist, J Schnürer
1Swedish Farmers Supply and Marketing Association, Stockholm, Sweden.
International Journal of Food Microbiology
|April 1, 1997
Summary
An electronic nose offers a safe and objective alternative to smelling grain for quality assessment. This technology accurately classifies grain odour and predicts spoilage, enhancing food safety.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural science
- Food science
- Sensor technology
Background:
- Grain quality assessment traditionally relies on odour, posing health risks from mould spores and toxins.
- Subjective odour determination can lead to inconsistent quality grading.
- Developing objective, safe methods for grain quality analysis is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an electronic nose system as an objective alternative for grain quality assessment.
- To determine the efficacy of an artificial neural network (ANN) in pattern recognition for grain odours.
- To correlate electronic nose predictions with established measures of grain spoilage.
Main Methods:
- An electronic nose comprising a diverse sensor array was employed.
- Gas samples from heated grain (oats, rye, barley, wheat) were analyzed.
- An artificial neural network (ANN) processed sensor data for pattern recognition.
- Wheat samples were analyzed for ergosterol content and microbial colony-forming units (cfu).
Main Results:
- The ANN accurately classified oat odour into categories: good, mouldy, weakly musty, and strongly musty.
- The system effectively predicted the percentage of mouldy barley and rye in mixed samples.
- High correlation was observed between ANN predictions and measured ergosterol and microbial cfu in wheat.
Conclusions:
- Electronic nose technology provides a reliable, rapid, and safe method for grain quality classification.
- This approach minimizes health risks associated with manual odour assessment.
- Potential applications extend to broader areas within food mycology and quality control.