Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference in identifying tactile patterns: response competition and temporal integration

J C Craig1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA. craigj@indiana.edu

Somatosensory & Motor Research
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect on non-vascular outcomes of lowering LDL cholesterol in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the Study of Heart and Renal Protection.

BMC nephrology·2017
Same author

Incidence and Predictors of Cancer Following Kidney Transplantation in Childhood.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2017
Same author

Obesity and hypertension in Australian young people: results from the Australian Health Survey 2011-2012.

Internal medicine journal·2016
Same author

Use of electromyography to detect muscle exhaustion in finishing barrows fed ractopamine HCl.

Journal of animal science·2016
Same author

The differential effect of socio-economic status, birth weight and gender on body mass index in Australian Aboriginal Children.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2016
Same author

Vision is superior to touch in shape perception even with equivalent peripheral input.

Journal of neurophysiology·2015
Same journal

Posture dependent changes in perceptual threshold during light touch foot sole stimulation.

Somatosensory & motor research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptomic mechanisms of lumbar sympathectomy improving cold allodynia of nerve injury in rat.

Somatosensory & motor research·2026
Same journal

Assessing physical activity and balance challenges in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.

Somatosensory & motor research·2026
Same journal

Characteristic differences in somatosensory gating between adolescents and adults.

Somatosensory & motor research·2026
Same journal

Disappearing hemispheric lateralization in tactile habituation: an electrophysiological approach.

Somatosensory & motor research·2025
Same journal

Textured foot orthotics and proprioception: augmenting cutaneous feedback to improve joint position sense accuracy.

Somatosensory & motor research·2025
See all related articles

When presented together, vibrotactile patterns can interfere with target identification. This study found that response competition, not temporal integration, causes this interference in pattern recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Vibrotactile spatial pattern identification can be impaired when target and nontarget patterns are presented simultaneously.
  • This impairment may stem from competing neural responses or the formation of a composite pattern via temporal integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether response competition is compatible with temporal integration and composite pattern formation.
  • To determine the underlying mechanisms of interference in vibrotactile pattern identification.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to examine temporal integration and its link to response competition.
  • Stimulus conditions were varied to assess pattern identification under different interference scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both temporal integration and response competition were observed under similar stimulus conditions, interfering with target pattern identification.
  • Even when composite patterns formed, individual constituent patterns remained identifiable.
  • Interference attributed to response competition was not caused by temporal integration.

Conclusions:

  • Response competition and temporal integration can coexist and independently impede vibrotactile pattern identification.
  • Temporal integration does not fully explain the interference observed due to response competition.
  • The findings differentiate the mechanisms underlying pattern identification interference in tactile perception.