Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outpatient inflatable penile prosthesis insertion

B B Garber1

  • 1Division of Urology, Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Urology
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Outpatient insertion of inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) is safe and effective for organic impotence. This approach shows low complication rates comparable to inpatient procedures, making it a viable treatment option.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A retrospective analysis of risk factors for IPP reservoir entry into the peritoneum after abdominal wall placement.

International journal of impotence research·2017
Same author

Intravesical penile implant reservoir: case report, literature review, and strategies for prevention.

International journal of impotence research·2012
Same author

Inflatable penile prosthesis: site-specific malfunction analysis.

International journal of impotence research·2003
Same author

Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?

Urology·1998
Same author

Intracorporal lengths of organically impotent men.

International journal of impotence research·1996
Same author

Inflatable penile prosthesis: results of 150 cases.

British journal of urology·1996

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Men's Health

Background:

  • Organic impotence affects a significant number of men.
  • Traditional inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion often requires inpatient stays.
  • Evaluating outpatient protocols is crucial for improving patient access and reducing healthcare costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and initial outcomes of an outpatient protocol for multiple-component inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion.
  • To assess the safety and efficacy of ambulatory IPP implantation.

Main Methods:

  • A consecutive series of 95 men with organic impotence underwent outpatient implantation of a multiple-component IPP.
  • Short-term complications were systematically monitored through patient examinations, phone interviews, and follow-up office visits.

Main Results:

  • The study identified a low complication rate, with 1 case of gross hematuria requiring hospitalization and 1 case of periprosthetic infection (1%).
  • Urinary retention occurred in 4% of patients, managed effectively with temporary urethral catheterization.
  • No major device-related failures or long-term adverse events were reported in the short term.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple-component IPP insertion is readily adaptable to an outpatient setting.
  • The prosthetic infection rate in this outpatient protocol is comparable to established inpatient procedures.
  • Outpatient IPP insertion presents a safe and effective treatment alternative for men suffering from organic impotence.

Related Experiment Videos