Related Experiment Videos
The family history method using diagnostic criteria. Reliability and validity
Archives of General Psychiatry
|October 1, 1977
Summary
Comparing family history methods for psychiatric disorders, the family study method offers more accurate data. While the family history method underreports, using diagnostic criteria like the Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria can improve sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Genetics
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Familial history data aids psychiatric diagnosis, etiological research, and classification.
- Two primary methods exist: family history (from patient/relative) and family study (direct interviews).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and utility of the family history method versus the family study method.
- To introduce the Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria instrument.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of data collected via family history and family study methods.
- Development and application of the Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria for 12 psychiatric diagnoses.
Main Results:
- The family study method generally yields more accurate information.
- The family history method demonstrates significant underreporting of psychiatric disorders.
- Utilizing diagnostic criteria enhances sensitivity but does not eliminate underreporting.
Conclusions:
- The family study method is preferred for its higher accuracy in assessing familial psychiatric history.
- The Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria can improve the family history method's sensitivity.
- Underreporting remains a key limitation of the family history method, even with diagnostic aids.