Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Increased precision using countermatching in nested case-control studies

K Steenland1, J A Deddens

  • 1National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. 45226, USA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|May 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter: Robins-E risk of bias tool.

Environment international·2025
Same author

Optimizing Exposure Measures in Large-Scale Household Air Pollution Studies: Results from the Multicountry HAPIN Trial.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Risk assessment for PFOA and kidney cancer based on a pooled analysis of two studies.

Environment international·2022
Same author

Association between maternal exposure to particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Lima, Peru.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2020
Same author

Time-series analysis of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> and cardiorespiratory emergency room visits in Lima, Peru during 2010-2016.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2019
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities for Occupational Epidemiology in the Twenty-first Century.

Current environmental health reports·2017
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Countermatching, a new control selection method, significantly improves efficiency in nested case-control studies. This occupational health research shows countermatching with few controls offers precision comparable to random sampling with many controls.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Nested case-control studies are vital for estimating exposure effects in occupational cohorts when detailed exposure data are costly.
  • Exposure duration often serves as a surrogate for cumulative exposure, readily available for cohort members.
  • Traditional control selection involves random sampling from the risk set.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency of countermatching versus random sampling for control selection in nested case-control studies.
  • To evaluate the impact of different numbers of controls per case on study precision.
  • To assess the utility of countermatching in occupational cohort studies, specifically for silicosis among miners.

Main Methods:

  • Nested case-control study design applied to a cohort of miners.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of random sampling with two countermatching methods for control selection.
  • Analyses conducted with varying controls per case (100, 20, 10, and 3).
  • Replication of all analyses 50 times to assess statistical properties.

    • Main Results:

    • One countermatching method demonstrated a marked increase in efficiency compared to random sampling.
    • Countermatching with 3 controls per case provided approximately a 25% increase in relative efficiency.
    • This efficiency gain was comparable to using 10 controls per case with random sampling.

    Conclusions:

    • Countermatching is a valuable technique for enhancing precision in nested case-control studies.
    • It offers a more efficient approach to control selection, especially when resources are limited.
    • This method can improve the statistical power of occupational exposure research.