Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Key problems in using health status measures

G Barrett1, C R Victor

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
|March 19, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Women's experiences of early pregnancy assessment unit services: a qualitative investigation.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

Quantified aluminium levels released into blood and fluids using the Level 1 Fast Flow Fluid Warmer.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

Polypoid laryngeal lesions.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2020
Same author

On the Stability of Reported Pregnancy Intentions from Pregnancy to 1 Year Postnatally: Impact of Choice of Measure, Timing of Assessment, Women's Characteristics and Outcome of Pregnancy.

Maternal and child health journal·2019
Same author

A florid paranasal sinus reaction from a systemic disease.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2018
Same author

A multicentre 2-cycle retrospective audit of postoperative haemorrhages from 2169 tonsillectomies.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2016
Same journal

Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
See all related articles

This article discusses the creation and advantages of health status measures. A critical approach is essential for these tools to effectively support healthcare and health research.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Health status measures are increasingly utilized in healthcare and research.
  • Conceptualizing and quantifying health presents significant challenges.
  • The development of these measures requires careful consideration of various factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development process of health status measures.
  • To highlight the benefits derived from the application of health status measures.
  • To emphasize the need for a critical evaluation of health status measures.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on the evolution of health status measures.
  • Analysis of conceptual frameworks for health.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of quantification challenges in health assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Health status measures have evolved significantly, offering valuable insights.
    • Quantifying subjective health experiences remains a complex task.
    • The utility of these measures is contingent upon their appropriate application.

    Conclusions:

    • A critical and informed approach is paramount for the effective use of health status measures.
    • These instruments can significantly benefit health care delivery and health research.
    • Further refinement and critical appraisal are necessary to maximize the value of health status measures.